Sign in to follow this  
antonio

Hardware Apple

Recommended Posts

Perché non approfitti della sosta tecnica per farti overcloccare il Titanic a 500? Basta che trovi a Palermo un tecnico capace e c'è solo da dissaldare e risaldare in posizione diversa un resistore.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest

Quando finisce la garanzia l'overclock lo faccio senz'altro.

Anche se non ho capito bene che affidabilità si ottiene.

Inoltre, visto che l'hanno spedito a Milano o in Olanda, posso al massimo farmi (nel frattempo) overcloccare la vespa.

E in questo i tecnici palermitani sono decisamente più professionali di quelli di Cupertino.

Posted Image

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest

In generale si può cambiare... Bisogna al solito vedere se c'e' CHI te la cambia

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Occhio però Cixxo che overckoccandoti la vespa a 550 l'affidabilità della medesima potrebbe risultare compromessa, soprattutto in partenza al semaforo Posted Image

In bocca al lupo per il tuo Ti

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cari amici, ho letto l’articolo su macity, riguardo il modo via terminale di controllare la velocita’

Di ICS con il mac…

Ho fatto la mia prova con un Titanium 400 con 640 mb di ram e OS X 10.1.2

Beh la mia prova era ben peggiore della prova fatto sul Pismo 500.

Voi cosa ne pensate?

Questa e’ la prova del Pismo fatta da Macity.

Openssl speed

pismo500:root] [~] # openssl speed

Doing md2 for 3s on 8 size blocks: 122483 md2's in 2.04s

Doing md2 for 3s on 64 size blocks: 43720 md2's in 2.08s

Doing md2 for 3s on 256 size blocks: 14695 md2's in 2.12s

Doing md2 for 3s on 1024 size blocks: 3173 md2's in 1.52s

Doing md2 for 3s on 8192 size blocks: 516 md2's in 2.15s

Doing mdc2 for 3s on 8 size blocks: 154094 mdc2's in 0.70s

Cosa ne pensate?

Che ne dite se facciamo un po' di confronti?

Dopo che postate i vostri risultati postero' il mioPosted Image

ciao

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

a me è venuta qualche riga in più.......

Doing md2 for 3s on 8 size blocks: 160820 md2's in 3.00s

Doing md2 for 3s on 64 size blocks: 55671 md2's in 3.00s

Doing md2 for 3s on 256 size blocks: 18823 md2's in 2.99s

Doing md2 for 3s on 1024 size blocks: 5161 md2's in 3.00s

Doing md2 for 3s on 8192 size blocks: 665 md2's in 3.00s

Doing mdc2 for 3s on 8 size blocks: 561795 mdc2's in 2.99s

Doing mdc2 for 3s on 64 size blocks: 78636 mdc2's in 3.00s

Doing mdc2 for 3s on 256 size blocks: 19900 mdc2's in 3.00s

Doing mdc2 for 3s on 1024 size blocks: 5008 mdc2's in 3.01s

Doing mdc2 for 3s on 8192 size blocks: 626 mdc2's in 3.02s

Doing md4 for 3s on 8 size blocks: 2221036 md4's in 3.00s

Doing md4 for 3s on 64 size blocks: 1319827 md4's in 3.00s

Doing md4 for 3s on 256 size blocks: 625458 md4's in 3.00s

Doing md4 for 3s on 1024 size blocks: 201741 md4's in 3.00s

Doing md4 for 3s on 8192 size blocks: 27538 md4's in 3.01s

Doing md5 for 3s on 8 size blocks: 1467465 md5's in 3.00s

Doing md5 for 3s on 64 size blocks: 804985 md5's in 3.00s

Doing md5 for 3s on 256 size blocks: 353087 md5's in 3.01s

Doing md5 for 3s on 1024 size blocks: 108257 md5's in 3.00s

Doing md5 for 3s on 8192 size blocks: 14507 md5's in 3.00s

Doing hmac(md5) for 3s on 8 size blocks: 615634 hmac(md5)'s in 3.00s

Doing hmac(md5) for 3s on 64 size blocks: 457785 hmac(md5)'s in 3.00s

Doing hmac(md5) for 3s on 256 size blocks: 264261 hmac(md5)'s in 3.00s

Doing hmac(md5) for 3s on 1024 size blocks: 98444 hmac(md5)'s in 3.00s

Doing hmac(md5) for 3s on 8192 size blocks: 14351 hmac(md5)'s in 3.01s

Doing sha1 for 3s on 8 size blocks: 1446823 sha1's in 3.00s

Doing sha1 for 3s on 64 size blocks: 788783 sha1's in 3.00s

Doing sha1 for 3s on 256 size blocks: 343466 sha1's in 3.00s

Doing sha1 for 3s on 1024 size blocks: 105451 sha1's in 3.00s

Doing sha1 for 3s on 8192 size blocks: 14138 sha1's in 3.01s

Doing rmd160 for 3s on 8 size blocks: 990077 rmd160's in 3.00s

Doing rmd160 for 3s on 64 size blocks: 531945 rmd160's in 3.00s

Doing rmd160 for 3s on 256 size blocks: 228489 rmd160's in 3.00s

Doing rmd160 for 3s on 1024 size blocks: 69738 rmd160's in 3.01s

Doing rmd160 for 3s on 8192 size blocks: 9310 rmd160's in 3.01s

Doing rc4 for 3s on 8 size blocks: 9508362 rc4's in 3.01s

Doing rc4 for 3s on 64 size blocks: 1565745 rc4's in 3.00s

Doing rc4 for 3s on 256 size blocks: 405118 rc4's in 3.00s

Doing rc4 for 3s on 1024 size blocks: 102152 rc4's in 3.01s

Doing rc4 for 3s on 8192 size blocks: 12812 rc4's in 3.00s

Doing des cbc for 3s on 8 size blocks: 2967877 des cbc's in 3.00s

Doing des cbc for 3s on 64 size blocks: 437114 des cbc's in 3.00s

Doing des cbc for 3s on 256 size blocks: 111194 des cbc's in 3.00s

Doing des cbc for 3s on 1024 size blocks: 27915 des cbc's in 2.99s

Doing des cbc for 3s on 8192 size blocks: 3501 des cbc's in 3.01s

Doing des ede3 for 3s on 8 size blocks: 1216051 des ede3's in 3.00s

Doing des ede3 for 3s on 64 size blocks: 162833 des ede3's in 3.00s

Doing des ede3 for 3s on 256 size blocks: 40994 des ede3's in 3.00s

Doing des ede3 for 3s on 1024 size blocks: 10261 des ede3's in 3.00s

Doing des ede3 for 3s on 8192 size blocks: 1285 des ede3's in 3.01s

Doing idea cbc for 3s on 8 size blocks: 2686573 idea cbc's in 3.01s

Doing idea cbc for 3s on 64 size blocks: 388732 idea cbc's in 3.00s

Doing idea cbc for 3s on 256 size blocks: 98956 idea cbc's in 3.00s

Doing idea cbc for 3s on 1024 size blocks: 24825 idea cbc's in 3.00s

Doing idea cbc for 3s on 8192 size blocks: 3110 idea cbc's in 3.01s

Doing rc2 cbc for 3s on 8 size blocks: 2048536 rc2 cbc's in 3.00s

Doing rc2 cbc for 3s on 64 size blocks: 285939 rc2 cbc's in 3.01s

Doing rc2 cbc for 3s on 256 size blocks: 72413 rc2 cbc's in 3.00s

Doing rc2 cbc for 3s on 1024 size blocks: 18150 rc2 cbc's in 3.00s

Doing rc2 cbc for 3s on 8192 size blocks: 2271 rc2 cbc's in 3.00s

Doing rc5-32/12 cbc for 3s on 8 size blocks: 6484658 rc5-32/12 cbc's in 3.00s

Doing rc5-32/12 cbc for 3s on 64 size blocks: 1210153 rc5-32/12 cbc's in 3.01s

Doing rc5-32/12 cbc for 3s on 256 size blocks: 319499 rc5-32/12 cbc's in 3.00s

Doing rc5-32/12 cbc for 3s on 1024 size blocks: 81201 rc5-32/12 cbc's in 3.01s

Doing rc5-32/12 cbc for 3s on 8192 size blocks: 10149 rc5-32/12 cbc's in 3.00s

Doing blowfish cbc for 3s on 8 size blocks: 4707903 blowfish cbc's in 3.01s

Doing blowfish cbc for 3s on 64 size blocks: 774519 blowfish cbc's in 3.00s

Doing blowfish cbc for 3s on 256 size blocks: 200588 blowfish cbc's in 3.00s

Doing blowfish cbc for 3s on 1024 size blocks: 50566 blowfish cbc's in 3.00s

Doing blowfish cbc for 3s on 8192 size blocks: 6333 blowfish cbc's in 3.01s

Doing cast cbc for 3s on 8 size blocks: 4062790 cast cbc's in 3.00s

Doing cast cbc for 3s on 64 size blocks: 641140 cast cbc's in 3.01s

Doing cast cbc for 3s on 256 size blocks: 164888 cast cbc's in 3.00s

Doing cast cbc for 3s on 1024 size blocks: 41522 cast cbc's in 3.01s

Doing cast cbc for 3s on 8192 size blocks: 5205 cast cbc's in 3.00s

Doing 512 bit private rsa's for 10s: 1567 512 bit private RSA's in 10.00s

Doing 512 bit public rsa's for 10s: 15870 512 bit public RSA's in 9.99s

Doing 1024 bit private rsa's for 10s: 262 1024 bit private RSA's in 10.04s

Doing 1024 bit public rsa's for 10s: 4723 1024 bit public RSA's in 10.01s

Doing 2048 bit private rsa's for 10s: 39 2048 bit private RSA's in 10.07s

Doing 2048 bit public rsa's for 10s: 1278 2048 bit public RSA's in 10.01s

Doing 4096 bit private rsa's for 10s: 6 4096 bit private RSA's in 10.90s

Doing 4096 bit public rsa's for 10s: 344 4096 bit public RSA's in 10.01s

Doing 512 bit sign dsa's for 10s: 1626 512 bit DSA signs in 10.00s

Doing 512 bit verify dsa's for 10s: 1336 512 bit DSA verify in 10.01s

Doing 1024 bit sign dsa's for 10s: 474 1024 bit DSA signs in 10.01s

Doing 1024 bit verify dsa's for 10s: 387 1024 bit DSA verify in 10.01s

Doing 2048 bit sign dsa's for 10s: 133 2048 bit DSA signs in 10.07s

Doing 2048 bit verify dsa's for 10s: 106 2048 bit DSA verify in 10.01s

OpenSSL 0.9.6b 9 Jul 2001

built on: Sun Sep 2 16:13:21 PDT 2001

options:bn(32,32) md2(int) rc4(ptr,int) des(idx,cisc,4,long) idea(int) blowfish(idx)

compiler: cc -arch i386 -arch ppc -g -O3 -pipe -Wno-precomp -arch i386 -arch ppc -pipe

The 'numbers' are in 1000s of bytes per second processed.

type 8 bytes 64 bytes 256 bytes 1024 bytes 8192 bytes

md2 428.85k 1187.65k 1611.60k 1761.62k 1815.89k

mdc2 1503.13k 1677.57k 1698.13k 1703.72k 1698.08k

md4 5922.76k 28156.31k 53372.42k 68860.93k 74947.27k

md5 3913.24k 17173.01k 30029.99k 36951.72k 39613.78k

hmac(md5) 1641.69k 9766.08k 22550.27k 33602.22k 39057.61k

sha1 3858.19k 16827.37k 29309.10k 35993.94k 38477.91k

rmd160 2640.21k 11348.16k 19497.73k 23724.82k 25338.05k

rc4 25271.39k 33402.56k 34570.07k 34752.04k 34985.30k

des cbc 7914.34k 9325.10k 9488.55k 9560.19k 9528.30k

des ede3 3242.80k 3473.77k 3498.15k 3502.42k 3497.25k

idea cbc 7140.39k 8292.95k 8444.25k 8473.60k 8464.16k

rc2 cbc 5462.76k 6079.77k 6179.24k 6195.20k 6201.34k

rc5-32/12 cbc 17292.42k 25730.83k 27263.91k 27624.53k 27713.54k

blowfish cbc 12512.70k 16523.07k 17116.84k 17259.86k 17235.86k

cast cbc 10834.11k 13632.21k 14070.44k 14125.76k 14213.12k

sign verify sign/s verify/s

rsa 512 bits 0.0064s 0.0006s 156.7 1588.6

rsa 1024 bits 0.0383s 0.0021s 26.1 471.8

rsa 2048 bits 0.2582s 0.0078s 3.9 127.7

rsa 4096 bits 1.8167s 0.0291s 0.6 34.4

sign verify sign/s verify/s

dsa 512 bits 0.0062s 0.0075s 162.6 133.5

dsa 1024 bits 0.0211s 0.0259s 47.4 38.7

dsa 2048 bits 0.0757s 0.0944s 13.2 10.6

è meglio o peggio? io non ho ben capito....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest

enrico, mi spiegheresti cosa vogliono dire tutte quelle linee? io irescoa cavare un senso solo dal "rsa 512 bits 0.0064s" che credo volgia dire che ci mette un zinzinesimo di secondo per decrittare una RSA a 512 Bit... poi controlla la firma, ma tutto il resto... boh!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

non ne ho la minima idea.

Su macity hanno detto che minore e' il tempo in secondi, e migliori sono le prestazioni della macchina.

fra un po' posto il mio risultato.

luca, sei a casa, o sei tornato in inghilterra?

scusa un po' OT e soprattutto CT (affari tuoi),pero' sono curioso...tanto per sapere se hai il tuo iMac per provare il test.

ciao

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this